Orientaciones de Cambio en la Sociología de la Religión

Religion must be understood a historical human fact and as a social-historical process.
It is not only a cultural limit, but also a cultural process that involves human aspirations, values and the reason to be on a human existance in a certain place and time.
Thatís why, religious as cultures and civilizations, may grow or die, or be the object of the constant flux of social change.
Following Weber and Geertz, we must understand and treat religion mainly as a cultural category.

Como citar:

Kokosalakis, N. (1991). Orientaciones de Cambio en la Sociología de la Religión. Religiones Latinoamericanas. 1. pp. 11 – 24. Recuperado de:
https://www.religioneslatinoamericanas.com.mx/articulo/kokosalakis-1-1/

Referencias

1. Beckford, J. (1987) «Is the Sacred a Sociological Category?» in The Journal of Oriental Studies vol 26 No. 1 33-39.
2. Beckford, J. (1988) «Religion, Self-help and Privatization» paper presented at the A.S.R. Conference Atlanta Georgia August 1988.
3. Beckford, J. and Luckmann (Eds) (1989). The  Changing face of religion London Sage Publications. Durkheim E.
4. Beckford, J. and Luckmann. (1968) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London, Allen and Unwin.
5. Husserl E. (1965) Logique formelle  et  Logique Transcendatale. Paris presses Universitaires de  France.
6. Husserl E. (1979) The  Crisis of European  Science and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, North Western University Press.
7. Levine D. (Ed.) (1988) Religion and Political Conflict in Latin America. Chapel Chapel Hill, London The  University of North Carolina Press.
8. Luckmann T. (1967) The Invisible Religion. London MacMillan.

Lista completa en el PDF del artículo

Número 1, enero – junio 1991